WABE News and the Atlanta Journal Constitution have the story.

Prosecutors say that Steven Manley and Robert Allen planned to rob the home of Emmett Whatley in February of 2007, because they knew he stored large sum of cash there. However, the state claims that their robbery plans went askew when Whatley was shot and killed in his front yard. After a jury trial, Allen and Manley were convicted and received life sentences for Whatley’s death.

Allen and Manley’s criminal defense attorney won a reversal of the murder convictions on appeal, since the trial judge failed to allow defense attorneys to fully cross-examine state witnesses. WABE legal analyst Page Pate told WABE listeners that, “The Supreme Court is trying to send a message to trial judges in this state that you need to let defense attorneys probe about special deals.” Specifically, Pate explained, “Any sort of benefit that may accrue to the witness by testifying for the state needs to be explored at trial.”

The Supreme Court also ruled that a statement given by Manley should have been suppressed, since the statement came after Manley had asked for an attorney. In the statement, Manley admitted to being in Whatley’s neighborhood on the night of the murder.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

The Child Exploitation Unit of the Atlanta Police Department has launched an investigation into the matter after learning that more Lovett School students may have sent or received inappropriate photos. Police have not yet said whether charges will be filed against those involved.

The term “sexting” most commonly refers to the sending and receiving of sexual images via cell phone. When the picture is of a person under the age of 18, the sender and receiver can be charged with a felony. This is true even when the photo in question is of the person sending the text message.

Individuals arrested for sexting are commonly charged with the crime of sexual exploitation of a child. If convicted, a person aged 17 years or older could face between five and 20 years in prison and would be forced to register as a sex offender. Those under 17 could also face tough penalties.

In cases where the underage person made the image, or was the person transmitting or receiving it, there may be constitutional protections that apply. This is a new area of law and our firm is working hard to make sure that kids are not prosecuted under unduly harsh sex offender laws for communications that occur exclusively between minors. There is a big difference between a 40 year old sexual predator who molests young children, and a teenage girl sending naked pictures of herself to her boyfriend.

The Athens Banner-Herald has the story.

In one recent case, a UGA law student told police that she had been mugged on College Station Road after walking home from work one night. Police say that the story was false and that the student was only trying to gain sympathy from her husband. Several other high profile cases have also turned out to be nothing more than made-up stories.

The crackdown on false reporting is due largely to the fact that police claim to spend a great deal of resources investigating fake crimes. This includes interviewing witnesses, interrogating suspects and collecting evidence. Authorities are also worried that the fake crimes will give Athens an inflated crime rate and make some parts of the city appear to be more crime ridden than they actually are.

Under Georgia law, the false reporting of a crime is a misdemeanor and is punishable by one year in jail. Prosecutors in Athens have pledged to make sure that offenders actually serve jail time if they are convicted of the offense.

Unfortunately, false reports of crimes do happen. Many times, it will take an experienced defense lawyer to investigate the charges and convince the prosecutor that the alleged "victim" simply made the whole thing up. In many cases, a false arrest can lead to the loss of a job, the expense of significant attorney's fees, public humiliation, and possible jail time.

We hope that the police in Athens, and elsewhere in Georgia, remain diligent for false reports of crimes. If they do a thorough job of investigating these claims, some wrongful arrests could be avoided.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

The investigation was initiated at the request of the DeKalb school system’s administration, but the exact reason for the search of Lewis’ home is not yet clear. However, in October, the residence and office of DeKalb’s former Chief Operating Officer, Patricia Pope, were searched after allegations arose that she illegally steered contracts to her husband, an architect, and construction companies with which she had connections. Pope is still being investigated by the District Attorney’s Office.

Our criminal defense lawyers have successfully represented several federal, state and local officials who have been accused of public corruption. Public corruption cases are often difficult to handle due to political pressures, community outcries and heavy media coverage. A good criminal defense attorney will work to protect his client’s reputation within community in addition to fighting any pending criminal charges. Through early intervention a defense attorney can help to ensure that allegations do not lead to false news reports, disciplinary actions or any other occurrences which could potentially harm one’s reputation.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

Reineke was driving her Ford Edge through an intersection on Sugarloaf Parkway when she struck and killed 48-year-old James Eaton III. The accident occurred around 8 p.m. on October 30 during dark and rainy conditions. Police reports indicate that Eaton stepped into the crosswalk while Reineke had a green light. Reineke was not speeding or violating any other traffic laws.

Gwinnett police arrested Reineke on the notion that the outcome may have been different had she not been texting. Reineke’s defense attorney, Larry Delan, has publicly stated that his client was not texting at the time of the accident. Delan also believes that authorities are using Reineke as a test case in hopes of expanding vehicular homicide prosecutions. Currently, texting while driving is not a crime in Georgia although proposed legislation may change that in the near future.

Under Georgia law, homicide by vehicle is generally punished as a misdemeanor when a minor traffic violation results in the death of a person. However, the offense can be prosecuted as a felony if the driver was driving recklessly, under the influence of drugs or alcohol, fleeing a police officer, involved in a hit and run or failed to stop for a school bus.

Our criminal defense attorneys have successfully resolved several vehicular homicide cases. One of the most powerful defenses to a homicide by vehicle charge is to show that the driver’s conduct did not cause the death. As in this case, there are many times when the deceased’s own actions largely contributed to the death. Another powerful defense is to argue that the driver did not intend the act which resulted in the death. A good criminal defense attorney will work with law enforcement and prosecutors to show that his client is not criminally liable. Early intervention can often lead to dismissed or reduced charges.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

The week-long trial forced jurors to answer whether Lona Scott, 47, shot her husband six times to protect herself or whether she was after his millions of dollars. After 20 hours of deliberation, the jury, which consisted of four women and eight men, were evenly divided as to guilt. It was at that time that Superior Court Judge Cynthia Brown issued the mistrial.

Lona’s husband, Ralph C. “Cliff” Scott, 42, was described as a muscular man who ran a successful trucking company. Lona and Ralph Scott wedded in 2000 and endured a turbulent marriage with alleged past acts of violence and cheating.

During trial, jurors heard Lona Scott explain how her husband, Ralph C. “Cliff” Scott, became angered late one night in March of 2008 after she refused to have sex with him or talk about the divorce petition she had filed. She then described to jurors the scene that took place in the couple’s master bedroom. Cliff Scott apparently pulled Lona’s hair and put her in a choke-hold. He only released her after she told him that he was going to wake their 5 year old daughter. Lona then retrieved a .22 caliber hand gun from a desk in hopes of leaving the home safely.

However, Cliff Scott refused to let her leave and told her that he could kill her since she had a gun. He then allegedly charged after Lona at which time she fired a single bullet into his chest. Lona claims that Cliff charged her again causing her to pull the trigger five more times. Three of those bullets struck Cliff in the elbows and forehead. The other two lodged in his back as he turned and fell to the floor. Lona then called 911.

Defense attorney Brian Steel, of the Steel Law Firm in Atlanta, asked Lona Scott why she did it. She told jurors, “Because he was going to kill me.” However, Assistant District Attorney John Melvin believes that money was the true motive. Melvin argued to jurors that Lona was after Cliff Scott’s five million dollar estate. Melvin explained that Lona became enraged after learning that Cliff was in the process of transferring his money into a secretive account in the Bahamas where he planned to live.

The District Attorney’s Office expects to retry the case soon.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

Currently, Georgia ranks fourth in the nation for mortgage fraud. It is estimated that mortgage fraud referrals have cost Georgia around $145 million from 2005 to 2008. The special law enforcement unit that has been proposed would investigate crimes involving mortgage fraud throughout the state. Legislators hope that the unit will act as a deterrent and result in more prosecutions. If the unit is created, it will draw resources from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation as well as the Department of Banking and Finance.

Under Georgia’s Residential Mortgage Fraud Act, a person convicted of mortgage fraud may receive a one to ten year prison sentence as well as a $5,000 fine. If a person engages in a pattern of mortgage fraud, he or she could face a three to 20 year sentence and a $100,000 fine.

Our criminal defense attorneys have successfully represented numerous clients charged with mortgage fraud, including brokers, attorneys, investors, agents, appraisers and "straw-buyers.". A key element of mortgage fraud is knowledge. In other words, the state must be able to prove that a person knowingly engaged in the alleged fraud. A good criminal defense attorney will intervene early to work with prosecutors and law enforcement to show that his client had no knowledge of any alleged fraud or illegal activities. This early intervention can often lead to dismissed or reduced charges well before trial. Our lawyers have been able to get several mortgage fraud charges dismissed or successful resolved well before an indictment or trial.

The Macon Telegraph has the story.

The investigator, Allie Seckinger, testified during a suppression hearing that she did not coerce a suspect into making a statement. Specifically, Seckinger testified that she only told the suspect that she should think about her child’s welfare, and that she never threatened to have DFACS take the suspect’s child from her for refusal to admit to an armed robbery.

However, an audio tape surfaced two days later which revealed that Seckinger’s testimony was a lie, and the statement was eventually suppressed. The DA’s Office is also throwing out cases in which Seckinger was an essential witness and contemplating charges against Seckinger herself. Many of the cases that will be thrown out deal with sex crimes.

Seckinger is currently on paid administrative leave. If District Attorney Howard Simms chooses to prosecute Seckinger, she could face 10 years in prison.

It is an unfortunate reality that some members of the law enforcement community are willing to lie under oath. Perjury is particularly damaging in matters which lack physical and documentary evidence as is often the case with coerced confessions and false child molestation allegations.

The Athens Banner-Herald has the story.

Police conducted the raid on Wednesday after investigating the club for months. During the investigation, undercover officers posed as club customers and allege that the club was in fact engaged in prostitution. The club’s manager, Robert Barry Dillard, was arrested for keeping a place of prostitution. A 20-year-old employee was also arrested for possessing amphetamines, marijuana and sedatives.

Authorities are also expanding their investigation to include club ownership and management. The club’s owner, Emanuel Isaacs, has been in the adult entertainment business for decades and has owned clubs in both Athens and Atlanta. Isaacs, who is now 85, was convicted in 1982 of bombing a competing Atlanta strip club. He also owned a Fantasy World located in Winder which shut down four years ago after three people were charged with prostitution.

The penalties can be severe. Under Georgia law, the offense of keeping a place of prostitution is a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature which can carry a year in jail. Authorities may also elect to charge management and ownership under Georgia’s racketeering statute (commonly known as RICO). Racketeering carries a 5 to 20 year sentence along with a possible $25,000 fine.

The Athens Banner-Herald has the story.

The Barrow County District Attorney’s Office had charged Perry with reckless conduct, since the party at which Martin died occurred in Perry’s home. At trial, it was revealed that Martin’s body was not found until the following morning even though 20 to 40 people were at the prom party. Perry's defense attorney, Christine Koehler, did a fantastic job defending her client.

The trial came on the heels of a plea deal prosecutors made with Barbara Ann Michael, Perry’s step-mother. Michael was accused of allowing her teenage children to throw parties at her home. Prosecutors alleged that Michael was aware that alcohol was being served at the prom party even though she was not at home during the party and did not provide the alcohol. She ended up pleading to eight misdemeanors.

WTOC has the story.

The four allegedly spent around $2,000 of counterfeit money at the Target on East Victory Drive. Police believe they then returned around $800 worth of merchandise to the Savannah Mall Target. So far all of the bills were in $20 and $50 denominations.

According to police, a Target loss prevention officer followed one of the suspect’s cars and wrote down a tag number. That information led to the arrest of Necshelle Smart, Shauawquinette Smart, Tyler Murphy and Monica Miller. The four are believed to be related.

All of the arrested individuals were given a bond except Necshelle who apparently has a prior forgery conviction. They are expected to appear in court on February 8.

Under Georgia law, forgery can lead to a 10 year sentence while racketeering can result in a five to 20 year sentence.

Our criminal defense attorneys have successfully handled numerous racketeering and forgery charges. In some counterfeit cases, individuals are recorded on videotape exchanging cash for merchandise. In other cases, a tip will point police to a home where a counterfeit operation is being conducted. Whatever the case may be, a good criminal defense attorney will explore every step of a police investigation to determine if there was probable cause to arrest an individual or search a home. If police conducted an illegal search or seizure, the evidence used against that person will generally be suppressed.

In this case, as in any other criminal case, all of the individuals charged are presumed innocent. There will need to be proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict any of them at trial.

After we successfully suppressed an illegal wiretap and our client's statements, prosecutors agreed to drop all charges against our client. The dismissal was filed in open court yesterday.

The case began a couple of years ago when the Chatham Counter Narcotics Team placed a wiretap on an individual accused of trafficking cocaine from Atlanta to Savannah. Based on the tap and other information, the Chatham County Sheriff’s Department pulled over a van being driven by a different individual in November 2008. Inside the van, police found 10 kilos of cocaine. Police then began arresting individuals they believed they heard on the wire tap.

Our client was one of those individuals. Police interrogated our client without ever reading him his Miranda warnings in the hopes of eliciting incriminating statements. He was then indicted for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and trafficking in cocaine. The trafficking in cocaine charge alone carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years in prison.

We fought and won a motion to suppress the statements our client made to police during his interrogation. Under Georgia and federal law, only voluntary statements may be used against a defendant in a criminal trial. For a statement during a custodial interrogation to be voluntary, police must first give the defendant his Miranda warnings. In this case, such a warning was not given, and as a result, our client’s statements were suppressed.

Along with a Savannah criminal lawyer who represented a co-defendant, we were also able to suppress all phone conversations recorded on the wiretap.

With the wiretap and statements suppressed, the state had no evidence which linked our client to the 10 kilos of cocaine, other than the fact that our client may have known some of the alleged co-conspirators.

We were fortunate to have been successful in our pretrial motions. Drug conspiracy cases like this one can lead to very long prison sentences if the person is convicted at trial, regardless of the person's alleged role in the conspiracy.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

Closed door hearings began last Friday. At the conclusion of the investigation, the special grand jury is expected to issue a report stating its findings as well as whether any individuals should be indicted. The judges who makeup the Superior Court of Gwinnett County will then vote as to whether any further actions should be taken.

At Friday’s hearing, Jock Connell, Phil Hoskins, Steve North and Chuck Warbington appeared before the panel. Connell, a former county administrator, worked for the county for 20 years before retiring in December. Hoskins, the director of community service, oversees the county’s park department. North heads the department which supervises land purchases, and Warbington is a representative on the county planning commission.

Gwinnett County saw a similar investigation 1989 when a former DA impaneled a special grand jury to look into allegations of price-fixing on school milk contracts.

Our criminal defense attorneys have successfully represented several local, state and federal officials who have been charged with corruption offenses. Public corruption cases can be quite difficult due to intense media exposure and political pressures. In addition to fighting any criminal charges, a good defense attorney will work to ensure that allegations of corruption do not lead to false media reports, discipline, or any other actions which could potentially damage one’s reputation.

The Macon Telegraph has the story.

Federal prosecutors say 43-year-old Gregory Todd Bowden, of Byron, drove to a Sandy Springs restaurant to meet the fictitious mother and her daughter for sex. An FBI agent with the Innocent Images Task Force testified that she initially made contact with Bowden in an online chatroom sometime in October 2008. The agent then explained a series of online chats, emails and telephone calls she had with Bowden which spanned around five months.

According to the agent, Bowden initially asked her to join a virtual role-playing relationship. Their chats eventually evolved into setting up an actual meeting in Sandy Springs where Bowden was arrested. One chat reveals Bowden expressing concern that the girl may possibly tell others of the sexual activity. He was also quoted as saying “I don’t want to go to jail.”

In addition to online chats, the jury was shown various pictures including a photo of a woman and a child which the agent had sent to Bowden. Jurors were also shown pictures that Bowden sent to the agent including his face and a man’s genitals.

Bowden’s attorney, Franklin J. Hogue, told jurors in opening statements that Bowden only intended to role play with the woman in an incestuous fantasy. This argument coincides with statements Bowden gave authorities when he was arrested in February. Specifically, he told agents that he did not think the girl was real.

Pate & Brody is an accomplished Georgia law firm with offices in Atlanta, Macon, Madison and Savannah. Our lawyers are dedicated to pursuing justice for people charged with serious crimes. We have successfully represented clients facing serious federal criminal charges and state criminal charges in courts across Georgia. Our lawyers have been recognized on the list of Georgia's "Super Lawyers", and included among Georgia's "Legal Elite" by Georgia Trend Magazine.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

The operation consisted of 24 local police agencies which came from Gwinnett, DeKalb, Clayton, Cobb, Paulding, Hall and Cherokee counties. There were also federal agents from the FBI, ICE, the U.S. Marshal’s Service and the Secret Service. All in all, 40 teams were sent to addresses across the state in hopes of arresting 89 different people.

The background investigation began three months ago out of the GBI’s office in Cleveland. Police tracked various peer-to-peer networks which allow computer users to download videos and pictures containing child pornography from other users. Authorities then obtained search warrants for the addresses of these users. Tuesday’s sweeps were planned to coincide with the time that the users would be home in order to maximize the number of arrests. Some of those arrested will face prosecution in federal court.

Our criminal defense lawyers have successfully defended numerous clients accused of internet offenses including possession of child pornography. In our experience, these types of cases can be defended in many ways. For instance, it is not uncommon for law enforcement to charge people who were unaware that illegal videos or images were being stored on their computers. A good criminal defense attorney will show this by hiring a computer forensics expert to determine how the unlawful images got onto the computer. It is also not uncommon for the search warrant which allowed for the seizure of the computer to be deficient in some respect. This can be shown by conducting a thorough examination of the police investigation as well as examining the language of the search warrant itself.

Regardless of the defense, it is vital that an experienced criminal defense firm be retained as soon as possible after the arrest or search. Many times, a lawyer's early involvement in the case can make a huge difference in the outcome.