Posted On: July 11, 2008

Georgia troopers put to the "smell test" in drug case

Is it possible for a police officer to smell raw marijuana when it's wrapped up and locked in a car trunk?

That was the question asked by David West, a Georgia criminal defense lawyer, in a drug case currently pending in Gordon County.

Mr. West's client was arrested and charged with drug crimes after law enforcement officers found 10 pounds of marijuana in the trunk of the car he was driving. The police believed they had probable cause to search the car after catching a "whiff" of raw marijuana coming from the car.

The lawyer filed a motion to suppress the marijuana. Among other things, the lawyer argued that the police officers could not have possibly smelled the marijuana that was wrapped up and stored in the trunk. It's a standard motion in this type of case, and defense lawyers file them all the time.

What's unusual about this case is that the defense lawyer asked the judge to require the officers to do a smell test. The lawyer suggested that the evidence be put into the trunk of a random car in the parking lot. The officers would then be required to determine which car it was in.

Bill Rankin of the Atlanta Journal Constitution covered the story. In the first article reporting the filing of the motion, he quoted both the defense attorney and a medical expert from the University of Pennsylvania's "Smell and Taste Center" who agreed with the lawyer that a person could not smell marijuana when it is wrapped up and stored in a trunk.

Novel idea, but the judge would not go for it. The Atlanta Journal Constitution covered the judge's decision denying the smell test in a follow-up article.

I think most criminal defense lawyers would like to see if the officers could really smell what they say they smell in these traffic stop cases. If the science doesn't support them, the judge should really question whether there is sufficient probable cause to search a car just because an officer says he smelled something incriminating.

But no judge wants to be the first judge to require a police officer to walk around a parking lot sniffing car trunks. It may lead to a lot of dismissed drug cases.

Bookmark and Share

Posted On: July 3, 2008

Gwinnett County man found "not guilty" in dog park murder case

A man charged with murder in Gwinnett County Georgia was acquitted late last week. Charles Martin Coats was found "not guilty" of murder in the stabbing death of William Scott Carr that occurred on January 3, 2007.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has the story.

Coats admitted that he stabbed the man, but his lawyer argued that it was in self-defense. According to the attorney, Coats and Carr got into an argument over Carr's dogs at Yellow River Park in Gwinnett County. The dogs were bothering Coats, so he tried to get them out of the way. Carr became angry, and the men started arguing and threatening each other. According to Coats' lawyer, Carr said he'd kill Coats. The two started fighting and Coats stabbed him with a knife he had on him at the time. He stabbed him once in the throat with a four inch blade.

The prosecutors charged Coats with murder based on their theory that Coats killed Carr because of "anti-gay sentiments," and an ongoing disagreement over the dogs. The jury didn't buy it.

Congratulations to Brain Steel, Coats' Atlanta criminal defense lawyer, for an excellent job. I understand he spent many months preparing for this trial. The hard work obviously paid off.

Bookmark and Share